Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool 5.117 for iphone download

X-Chat feels crufty compared to Colloquy now, though to be fair, lately I have only run it on Windowsĭunno if it feels better in its native habitatīecause of public wifi in several places in Australia blocking port 6667 when I was traveling there, I recently set up screen+irssi and been pretty happy with that too Well, you have an even number of plus signs, so conceivably not, but it's certainly not recommended coding style. I feel compelled to demonstrate my patriotismĬolloquy sounds great, too bad I use Linux. I recently switched from XChat to Colloquy and been very happy to have made the switch I have a whole monitor with six channels tiled across it.Īlso not clear to me what a text-based IRC client isĮven though Colloquy doesn't quite do everything I would like Oh, also I think it only let me use one window for all channels, which is unacceptable. I tried irssi but didn't feel it was worth it to learn how to use it. I don't have a very good reason for this, though. I don't really know how to tell the difference. but to include excerpts outside this time period if my nick is mentioned.)Īlthough i am quite happy reading my mail in mutt over ssh, a text-based irc client doesn't do anything for me for some reason (up to a reasonable amount, say a day or two. and i want the proxy to feed my client scrollback content too when i connect to it.

I want an irc proxy so i can stay connected, but use an irc client locally. I run my shells under emacs, so emacs takes care of it Screen is why I have such high IRC uptime

If screen could fill my xterm scrollback buffers when i connect to it, rather than handle scrolling itself, i might use it more (or rather encouraged me to use it, it's not like I hadn't heard about it) (DOMContentLoaded is a simple counter-example to your earlier question)īy the way, for everyone here who told me about screen (Hixie? jgraham?): you rock. window.onfoo and body.onfoo are the same listsĮr, 'have a body.onblah' in the second window.onblah above Heycam: no, but all the events that have a window.onblah that isn't on HTMLElement.onblah have a window.onblah, at least per the HTML spec Is it the case that all events that fire at window currently have a ? if/when i have a spec to publish that has one, i'll ask. Yes, ask me to add the relevant stuff to the HTML spec From a spec designer perspective or from an implementor perspective?

Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool 5.117 for iphone download